N. BLAY, L. CARRASCO-RIBELLES, C. VIOLÁN and R. DE CID Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi: PMID:
P. TORÁN, S. MONTESINOS, A. PACHON-CAMACHO, G. DIEZ-FADRIQUE, I. RUIZ-ROJANO, I. ARTEAGA, G. PERA, N. MONTELLÀ-JORDANA, P. MONTERO-ALÍA, C. RODRÍGUEZ-PÉREZ, L. CABALLERIA and C. CHACÓN Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.3390/beverages9040100 PMID:
Background: Risky alcohol consumption (RAC) can lead to alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). Liver cirrhosis caused by ALD continues to increase as alcohol consumption continues unabated. In turn, the elderly are more sensitive to alcohol. Population ageing calls for preventive activities to improve their health. Brief interventions have proven to be cost-effective in addressing risk behaviours. Aim: We aimed to analyse the prevalence of RAC in people > 64 years and to assess the effect of a brief intervention in the subgroup of risky consumers. Methods: population-based study in two phases: (1) Phase I: Cross-sectional, descriptive multicentre study of prevalence of RAC in people > 64 years. (2) Phase II: Cluster randomized, controlled, single-blind, community-based clinical trial with two comparison groups of subjects with RAC, to assess the effectiveness of a brief intervention compared to standard practice in reducing alcohol consumption in primary care. Results: Out of the 932 subjects, 455 (49%) (268 men (64%) and 187 women (36%)) had an alcohol consumption that was considered to be risky. Overall, the brief intervention was effective in reducing alcohol consumption showing 1.8 OR (p = 0.030). That effect was caused by women whose group showed 3.3 OR (p = 0.009). There was no effect on men (p = 0.468). Conclusions: RAC in the elderly is very high, far more in men than in women. A brief intervention was successful in reducing alcohol consumption but not below risk levels. Further research is needed to determine which types of interventions are most effective in this population subgroup.
S. DIMITRIADIS, A. CASTELLS-SÁNCHEZ, F. ROIG-COLL, R. DACOSTA-AGUAYO, N. LAMONJA-VICENTE, P. TORÁN-MONSERRAT, A. GARCÍA-MOLINA, G. MONTE-RUBIO, C. STILLMAN, A. PERERA-LLUNA and M. MATARÓ Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1007/s11357-023-00946-8 PMID:37872293
Lifestyle interventions have positive neuroprotective effects in aging. However, there are still open questions about how changes in resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) contribute to cognitive improvements. The Projecte Moviment is a 12-week randomized controlled trial of a multimodal data acquisition protocol that investigated the effects of aerobic exercise (AE), computerized cognitive training (CCT), and their combination (COMB). An initial list of 109 participants was recruited from which a total of 82 participants (62% female; age = 58.38 +/- 5.47) finished the intervention with a level of adherence > 80%. Only in the COMB group, we revealed an extended network of 33 connections that involved an increased and decreased rsFC within and between the aDMN/pDMN and a reduced rsFC between the bilateral supplementary motor areas and the right thalamus. No global and especially local rsFC changes due to any intervention mediated the cognitive benefits detected in the AE and COMB groups. Projecte Moviment provides evidence of the clinical relevance of lifestyle interventions and the potential benefits when combining them.
C. CHACÓN, I. ARTEAGA, A. MARTÍNEZ-ESCUDÉ, I. ROJANO, N. LAMONJA-VICENTE, L. CABALLERIA, A. DIEZ, H. SCHRÖDER, M. MONTRAVETA, M. BOVO, P. GINES, G. PERA, G. DIEZ-FADRIQUE, A. PACHÓN-CAMACHO, N. ALONSO, I. GRAUPERA, P. TORÁN-MONSERRAT and C. EXPÓSITO Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286586 PMID:37831682
BackgroundNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rapidly increasing alongside overweight and obesity, not only in adults but also in children and adolescents. It is unknown what impact the development of NAFLD in childhood may have in later life. The importance of early detection and treatment lies in its potential for progression to cirrhosis, liver cancer and liver-related death, as well as its associated extrahepatic comorbidities. Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) with Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) is an effective, non-invasive and safe diagnostic method to estimate the degree of fibrosis and steatosis in the liver, but little is known about its applicability in the paediatric population. Aims1) To assess the prevalence of significant liver fibrosis (Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) >= 6.5 kPa) using VCTE, and that of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (>= 225 dB/m) using CAP in children and adolescents. 2) To determine the optimal cut-off points of the CAP to achieve maximum concordance with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings in the diagnosis of mild, moderate and severe NAFLD in children and adolescents. MethodsCross-sectional population-based study which will include 2,866 subjects aged between 9 and 16 years. Participants will undergo: anamnesis, physical examination, blood extraction, VCTE, MRI and questionnaires on socio-demographic data, personal and family medical history and lifestyle assessment. Applicability and relevanceThe study aims to establish the foundations for the use of VCTE in children and adolescents in order to achieve early diagnosis of NAFLD. Moreover, it will serve to understand in further detail the disease and to identify the risk groups of children and adolescents who may be at risk of developing it. Ultimately, this will help determine to which subgroups of the population we need to target resources for prevention and early detection of this entity, as well as possible intervention for its treatment.
I. VILLESEN, I. GRAUPERA, G. PERA, M. SERRA-BURRIEL, A. ARSLANOW, J. HANSEN, H. SCHNEFELD, C. HANSEN, M. ISRAELSEN, K. LINDVIG, K. BECH, P. ANDERSEN, R. DE KNEGT, F. LAMMERT, L. CASTERA, I. GRGUREVIC, S. PIANO, N. FABRELLAS, I. GUHA, E. TSOCHATZIS, J. SCHATTENBERG, J. PERICAS, L. CABALLERIA, A. KRAG, P. GINES and M. THIELE Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi: PMID:
F. ROIG-COLL, A. CASTELLS-SÁNCHEZ, G. MONTÉ-RUBIO, R. DACOSTA-AGUAYO, N. LAMONJA-VICENTE, P. TORAN-MONSERRAT, G. PERE, A. GARCÍA-MOLINA, J. TORMOS, M. ALZAMORA, D. STAVROS, M. SÁNCHEZ-CERON, M. VIA, K. ERICKSON and M. MATARÓ Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1007/s00421-023-05319-9 PMID:37768344
Introduction This is a 12-weeks randomized controlled trial examining the effects of aerobic exercise (AE), computerized cognitive training ( CCT) and their combination (COMB). We aim to investigate their impact on cardiovascular health and white matter (WM) integrity and how they contribute to the cognitive benefits. Methods 109 participants were recruited and 82 (62% female; age = 58.38 +/- 5.47) finished the intervention with > 80% adherence. We report changes in cardiovascular risk factors and WM integrity (fractional anisotropy (FA); mean diffusivity (MD)), how they might be related to changes in physical activity, age and sex, and their potential role as mediators in cognitive improvements. Results A decrease in BMI (SMD = – 0.32, p = 0.039), waist circumference (SMD = – 0.42, p = 0.003) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (SMD = – 0.42, p = 0.006) in the AE group and a decrease in BMI (SMD = – 0.34, p = 0.031) and DBP (SMD = – 0.32, p = 0.034) in the COMB group compared to the waitlist control group was observed. We also found decreased global MD in the CCT group (SMD = – 0.34; p = 0.032) and significant intervention-related changes in FA and MD in the frontal and temporal lobes in the COMB group. Conclusions We found changes in anthropometric measures that suggest initial benefits on cardiovascular health after only 12 weeks of AE and changes in WM microstructure in the CCT and COMB groups. These results add evidence of the clinical relevance of lifestyle interventions and the potential benefits when combining them.
Leomanni L, Collatuzzo G, Sansone E, Sala E, De Palma G, Porru S, Spiteri G, Monaco MGL, Basso D, Pavanello S, Scapellato ML, Larese Filon F, Cegolon L, Mauro M, Lodi V, Lazzarotto T, Noreña I, Reinkemeyer C, Giang LTT, Fabiánová E, Strhársky J, Dell'Omo M, Murgia N, Carrasco-Ribelles LA, Violán C, Mates D, Rascu A, Vimercati L, De Maria L, Asafo SS, Ditano G, Abedini M and Boffetta P Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.3390/vaccines11101527 PMID:37896931
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the immunity provided by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is an important public health issue. We analyzed the determinants of 12-month serology in a multicenter European cohort of vaccinated healthcare workers (HCW). METHODS: We analyzed the sociodemographic characteristics and levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (IgG) in a cohort of 16,101 vaccinated HCW from eleven centers in Germany, Italy, Romania, Slovakia and Spain. Considering the skewness of the distribution, the serological levels were transformed using log or cubic standardization and normalized by dividing them by center-specific standard errors. We fitted center-specific multivariate regression models to estimate the cohort-specific relative risks (RR) of an increase of one standard deviation of log or cubic antibody level and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for different factors and combined them in random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: We included 16,101 HCW in the analysis. A high antibody level was positively associated with age (RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00-1.08 per 10-year increase), previous infection (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.29-2.45) and use of Spikevax [Moderna] with combinations compared to Comirnaty [BioNTech/Pfizer] (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.97-1.19) and was negatively associated with the time since last vaccine (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98 per 30-day increase). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide insight about vaccine-induced immunity to SARS-CoV-2, an analysis of its determinants and quantification of the antibody decay trend with time since vaccination.
E. ZABALETA-DEL-OLMO, R. SANTESMASES-MASANA, R. MARTÍN-PAYO, A. ROMERO-COLLADO, J. ZAMORA-SÁNCHEZ, A. URPÍ-FERNÁNDEZ, M. GONZALEZ-DEL-RIO, I. LUMILLO-GUTIÉRREZ, M. SASTRE-RUS, L. JODAR-FERNÁNDEZ and E. HERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ-ESPARZA Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1111/wvn.12682 PMID:37743584
Background Missed nursing care is defined as care that is delayed, partially completed, or not completed at all. The scenario created by the COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced multifactorial determinants related to the care environment, nursing processes, internal processes, and decision-making processes, increasing missed nursing care.AimThis scoping review aimed to establish the quantity and type of research undertaken on missed nursing care during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods This review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, two national and regional databases, two dissertations and theses databases, a gray literature database, two study registers, and a search engine from November 1, 2019, to March 23, 2023. We included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed studies carried out in all healthcare settings that examined missed nursing care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Language restrictions were not applied. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection and data extraction. Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion or with an additional reviewer.Results We included 25 studies with different designs, the most common being acute care cross-sectional survey designs. Studies focused on determining the frequency and reasons for missed nursing care and its influence on nurses and organizational outcomes.Linking Evidence to Action Missed nursing care studies during the COVID-19 pandemic were essentially nurses-based prevalence surveys. There is an urgent need to advance the design and development of longitudinal and intervention studies, as well as to broaden the focus of research beyond acute care. Further research is needed to determine the impact of missed nursing care on nursing-sensitive outcomes and from the patient’s perspective.
Serra-Burriel M, Juanola A, Serra-Burriel F, Thiele M, Graupera I, Pose E, Pera G, Grgurevic I, Caballeria L, Piano S, van Kleef L, Reichert M, Roulot D, Pericàs JM, Schattenberg JM, Tsochatztis EA, Guha IN, Garcia-Retortillo M, Hernández R, Hoyo J, Fuentes M, Expósito C, Martínez A, Such P, Madir A, Detlefsen S, Tonon M, Martini A, Ma AT, Pich J, Bonfill E, Juan M, Soria A, Carol M, Gratacós-Ginès J, Morillas RM, Toran P, Navarrete JM, Torrejón A, Fournier C, Llorca A, Arslanow A, de Koning HJ, Cucchietti F, Manns M, Newsome PN, Hernáez R, Allen A, Angeli P, de Knegt RJ, Karlsen TH, Galle P, Wong VW, Fabrellas N, Castera L, Krag A, Lammert F, Kamath PS and Ginès P Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01174-1 PMID:37572680
BACKGROUND: Liver cirrhosis is a major cause of death worldwide. Cirrhosis develops after a long asymptomatic period of fibrosis progression, with the diagnosis frequently occurring late, when major complications or cancer develop. Few reliable tools exist for timely identification of individuals at risk of cirrhosis to allow for early intervention. We aimed to develop a novel score to identify individuals at risk for future liver-related outcomes. METHODS: We derived the LiverRisk score from an international prospective cohort of individuals from six countries without known liver disease from the general population, who underwent liver fibrosis assessment by transient elastography. The score included age, sex, and six standard laboratory variables. We created four groups: minimal risk, low risk, medium risk, and high risk according to selected cutoff values of the LiverRisk score (6, 10, and 15). The model’s discriminatory accuracy and calibration were externally validated in two prospective cohorts from the general population. Moreover, we ascertained the prognostic value of the score in the prediction of liver-related outcomes in participants without known liver disease with median follow-up of 12 years (UK Biobank cohort). FINDINGS: We included 14 726 participants: 6357 (43·2%) in the derivation cohort, 4370 (29·7%) in the first external validation cohort, and 3999 (27·2%) in the second external validation cohort. The score accurately predicted liver stiffness in the development and external validation cohorts, and was superior to conventional serum biomarkers of fibrosis, as measured by area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC; 0·83 [95% CI [0·78-0·89]) versus the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4; 0·68 [0·61-0·75] at 10 kPa). The score was effective in identifying individuals at risk of liver-related mortality, liver-related hospitalisation, and liver cancer, thereby allowing stratification to different risk groups for liver-related outcomes. The hazard ratio for liver-related mortality in the high-risk group was 471 (95% CI 347-641) compared with the minimal risk group, and the overall AUC of the score in predicting 10-year liver-related mortality was 0·90 (0·88-0·91) versus 0.84 (0·82-0·86) for FIB-4. INTERPRETATION: The LiverRisk score, based on simple parameters, predicted liver fibrosis and future development of liver-related outcomes in the general population. The score might allow for stratification of individuals according to liver risk and thus guide preventive care. FUNDING: European Commission under the H20/20 programme; Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria de Salud; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness; the European Regional Development Fund; and the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
L. CARRASCO-RIBELLES, J. LLANES-JURADO, C. GALLEGO-MOLL, M. CABRERA-BEAN, M. MONTEAGUDO-ZARAGOZA, C. VIOLÁN and E. ZABALETA-DEL-OLMO Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad168 PMID:37659105
Objective To describe and appraise the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques that can cope with longitudinal data from electronic health records (EHRs) to predict health-related outcomes.Methods This review included studies in any language that: EHR was at least one of the data sources, collected longitudinal data, used an AI technique capable of handling longitudinal data, and predicted any health-related outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplorer from inception to January 3, 2022. Information on the dataset, prediction task, data preprocessing, feature selection, method, validation, performance, and implementation was extracted and summarized using descriptive statistics. Risk of bias and completeness of reporting were assessed using a short form of PROBAST and TRIPOD, respectively.Results Eighty-one studies were included. Follow-up time and number of registers per patient varied greatly, and most predicted disease development or next event based on diagnoses and drug treatments. Architectures generally were based on Recurrent Neural Networks-like layers, though in recent years combining different layers or transformers has become more popular. About half of the included studies performed hyperparameter tuning and used attention mechanisms. Most performed a single train-test partition and could not correctly assess the variability of the model’s performance. Reporting quality was poor, and a third of the studies were at high risk of bias.Conclusions AI models are increasingly using longitudinal data. However, the heterogeneity in reporting methodology and results, and the lack of public EHR datasets and code sharing, complicate the possibility of replication.Registration PROSPERO database (CRD42022331388).