Publicacions

Perceived training needs by tutors of family and community medicine and nursing of specialized health training: a qualitative descriptive study.

Berlanga-Fernández S, Rodríguez-Monforte M, Pérez-Cañaveras RM, Valer-Martínez A, Copetti-Fanlo S, Simonet-Aineto PJ, Vizcaya-Moreno F and Villafáfila-Ferrero R
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1329671 PMID:39736967

INTRODUCTION: Specialized Health Training is a postgraduate training pathway in which physicians and nurses can choose to continue their learning and obtain the qualification of specialist professional in a specific field. The training is eminently practical with different clinical tracks in which nurses and physicians are tutored by clinician tutors. Our research aims to describe the experiences and perceptions of clinician tutors related to their own teaching performance and training needs. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study. The sample consisted of active clinician tutors of specialized health training of family and community nursing and medicine, this being the main inclusion criterion, regardless of the number of years of experience as a tutor. Data were analyzed following a content analysis method. RESULTS: Four focus groups were held with 25 participants: 32% nursing tutors (8) and 68% tutors of medicine (17). The main categories identified were: (1) teaching performance; (2) training needs; and (3) characteristics of an ideal training program. The sample consisted of a majority of tutors of medicine compared to nursing. CONCLUSION: Clinician tutors of Specialized Health Training of Family and Community nursing and medicine express the need to acquire pedagogical tools, to develop communication skills and to create a tutor network in order to improve their mentorship practice. Furthermore, more institutional recognition and protected time are also highlighted as important elements for their mentorship role. The findings of our research can serve as a guideline to start designing a training plan that meets the real needs of clinician tutors.

Insights on health policies from a political philosophy perspective

D. ABIÉTAR, M. MARTÍ-GONZÁLEZ, E. AGUILO and N. SÁNCHEZ-VALDIVIA
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1136/jech-2023-220568 PMID:39532394

Health policies play a crucial role in shaping people’s well-being. While public health often relies on evidence-based policy to improve health outcomes, many non-scientific factors determine the health policy-making process. This article explores how public health advocacy can be strengthened by examining the relationship between political philosophy and the scientistic aspirations of public health. We begin by critically assessing the deliberative decision-making model, offering insights on policy processes that could inspire new directions in health policy research. To enhance these efforts, we delve into the philosophical critique of scientism, aiming to liberate public health from its technocratic inclinations. Our analysis draws on political philosophy from two angles: first, we revisit Renaissance utopias to highlight the risks of a science-driven society devoid of ethics; second, we introduce modern perspectives on democratic justice, advocating for health policies that resist domination. Ultimately, we argue for a new model of health policy science that positions public health as a key political actor. By focusing on the everyday realities of policy-making, public health can tackle two fundamental questions: How are citizens’ interests considered in health policy? And how do we deliberate the goals and means of health policy? By addressing these questions, our proposals aim to enhance public health advocacy, promoting research and actions that lead to more just and inclusive health policies, ensuring the protection of everyone’s health.

Cost-effectiveness of a machine learning risk prediction model (LungFlag) in the selection of high-risk individuals for non-small cell lung cancer screening in Spain

J. TRUJILLO, J. SORIANO, M. MARZO, O. HIGUERA, L. GOROSPE, V. PAJARES, M. OLMEDO, N. ARRABAL, A. FLORES, J. GARCÍA, M. CRESPO, D. CARCEDO, C. HEUSER, M. OBRADOVIC, N. OLGHI, E. CHOMAN and L. SEIJO
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1080/13696998.2024.2444781 PMID:39697091

ObjectiveThe LungFlag risk prediction model uses individualized clinical variables to identify individuals at high-risk of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of LungFlag implementation in the Spanish setting for the identification of individuals at high-risk of NSCLC.MethodsA model combining a decision-tree with a Markov model was adapted to the Spanish setting to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon, comparing two hypothetical scenarios: screening with LungFlag versus non-screening, and screening with LungFlag versus screening the entire population meeting 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria. Model inputs were obtained from the literature and the clinical practice of a multidisciplinary expert panel. Only direct costs (of 2023), obtained from local sources, were considered. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of our results.ResultsA cohort of 3,835,128 individuals meeting 2013 USPSTF criteria would require 2,147,672 LDCTs scans. However, using LungFlag would only require 232,120 LDCTs scans. Cost-effectiveness results showed that LungFlag was dominant versus non-screening scenario, and outperformed the scenario where the entire population were screened since the observed loss of effectiveness (-224,031 life years [LYs] and -97,612 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) was largely offset by the significant cost savings provided (7,053 million). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for this strategy of screening the whole population versus using LungFlag was 72,000/QALY, showing that LungFlag is cost-effective. Various were described, such as the source of the efficacy or adherence rates, and other limitations inherent to cost-effectiveness analyses.ConclusionsUsing LungFlag for the selection of high-risk individuals for NSCLC screening in Spain would be a cost-effective strategy over screening the entire population meeting USPSTF 2013 criteria and is dominant over non-screening.

Information provision and financial incentives in Catalonia’s public primary care (2010-2019): an interrupted time series analysis.

Esteban-Fabró R, Coma E, Hermosilla E, Méndez-Boo L, Guiriguet C, Facchini G, Nicodemo C and Vidal-Alaball J
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101102 PMID:39469090

BACKGROUND: The relative efficacy of information provision versus financial incentives in improving primary care quality remains a critical, unresolved question. We investigated these two strategies in Catalonia’s public primary care system from 2010 to 2019: an innovative online platform providing real-time quality indicator information and targeted economic incentives for achieving indicator goals. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive interrupted time series regression analysis on data from 272 primary care practices (5,628,080 patients). This analysis used linear regression models with Newey-West standard errors, and a sensitivity analysis including logit transformations to address ceiling effects. We evaluated 1) immediate post-intervention changes (step changes) in indicator results and inter-practice variability (coefficient of variation, CV), and 2) shifts in pre-intervention trends (slopes). We scrutinized 39 indicators after rigorous quality control: 23 novel (12 informed, 11 incentivized) and 16 derived from existing incentivized indicators. Robustness checks included 14 consistently incentivized and 10 non-intervened indicators. Overall, we assessed 63 indicators: 18 control, 13 follow-up, 9 quaternary prevention, 7 treatment, 7 diagnosis, 6 screening and 3 vaccination indicators. FINDINGS: Informed indicators showed positive impacts in 75% (9/12) of cases, and incentivized indicators in 64% (7/11) of cases. Incentivized indicators displayed improvements in annual trends ranging from 6.66 to 1.25 percentage points, with step changes up to 8.87 percentage points. Information led to step changes ranging from 19.67 to 1.07 percentage points, along with trend improvements between 1.09 and 0.34 percentage points annually. Both interventions were associated with step reductions in variability (up to -0.18 CV reduction) and significant trend improvements. Derived indicators showed limited improvements in results or variability (31%, 5/16), with minor step increases up to 2.22 percentage points. INTERPRETATION: Our findings reveal that information provision alone can match or even surpass the impact of financial incentives in improving care quality and reducing practice variability. This challenges conventional wisdom and offers a cost-effective, scalable approach to primary care quality enhancement, with far-reaching implications for global health policy. FUNDING: European Union, Horizon Europe.

Prevalence of physical inactivity and risk of sarcopenia in primary care. Cross-sectional study

L. MARTIN, A. GRANADOS, A. MELENCHON, J. CRISTOBAL and M. HERNANDEZ
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102993 PMID:38875834

Objectives: Assess the prevalence of physical inactivity and risk of sarcopenia in primary care patients and their companions. Design: Cross-sectional study. We carried out an anonymous survey of primary care users (patients and companions) in primary care consultations and stands coinciding with a community health activity for World Physical Activity Day. Site: Five primary care centers (CAPs) of the South Metropolitan health region: in Cornell & agrave; de Llobregat (CAP Jaume Soler), in l’Hospitalet de Llobregat (CAP Florida Nord, CAP Florida Sud and CAP Bellvitge) and in Viladecans (CAP Maria Bernades) between 27 March to April 6, 2023 (coinciding with World Physical Activity Day). Participants: Primary care population consists of patients and their companions over 18 years of age. Interventions: The health workers administered questionnaires to users and companions. Main measurements: We evaluated physical inactivity with the BPAAT questionnaire, risk of sarcopenia with SARC-F screening test, sex and age range. We performed an univariate descriptive analysis to report prevalence. Results: Nine hundred ninety-eight participants were surveyed. Physical inactivity was present in 38.9% of the participants. Among those over 50 years (665 participants), 15.4% were at risk of sarcopenia (9.58% men, 19.2% women). Conclusions: The prevalence of physical inactivity and risk of sarcopenia (in individuals over 50 years old) in the studied population is high. Women have greater physical inactivity and a greater risk of sarcopenia than men. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espa & ntilde;a, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Cancer prevention recommendations: Update 2024

C. BARTOLOMÉ-MORENO, E. MELÚS-PALAZÓN, C. VELA-VALLESPÍN, S. ARANA-BALLESTAR, M. GALLEGO, J. NAVARRO and B. BELLAS-BECEIRO
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103128 PMID:39613364

Cancer is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality. Environmental factors along with lifestyle: tobacco and alcohol consumption, unhealthy diet and sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical activity, are some of the risk factors that have caused an increase in cancer. This article updates the evidence and recommendations for cancer prevention strategies through screening in asymptomatic patients, as well as early detection of signs and symptoms in medium-risk and high-risk populations. (c) 2024The Author(s).Published by Elsevier Espana,S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license

Sourdough Bread with Different Fermentation Times: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome

K. PÉREZ-VEGA, A. SANLLORENTE, M. ZOMEÑO, A. QUINDÓS, J. MUÑOZ-MARTÍNEZ, M. MALCAMPO, A. ALDEA-PERONA, A. HERNÁEZ, A. LLUANSÍ, M. LLIRÓS, I. ELIAS, N. ELIAS-MASIQUES, X. ALDEGUER, D. MUÑOZ, S. GAIXAS, G. BLANCHART, H. SCHRÖDER, J. HERNANDO-REDONDO, N. CARRÓN, P. GONZÁLEZ-TORRES, V. KONSTANTINIDOU, M. FITÓ and O. CASTAÑER
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.3390/nu16152380 PMID:39125261

The Mediterranean diet, featuring sourdough bread, shows promise in managing metabolic syndrome. This study explored the effects of two sourdough breads, with differing fermentation times but similar nutritional profiles, on inflammation, satiety, and gut microbiota composition in adults with metabolic syndrome. In a double-blind clinical trial, participants were randomized to consume either Elias Boulanger (R) long-fermentation (48 h) sourdough bread (EBLong) or Elias Boulanger (R) short-fermentation (2 h) sourdough bread (EBShort) over a two-month period. We assessed clinical parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, satiety-related hormones, and the richness and abundance of gut microbiota at baseline and follow-up. The participants included 31 individuals (mean age, 67, 51.6% female). EBShort was associated with reduced levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM), and all participants, regardless of the intervention, exhibited a decrease in sICAM and diastolic pressure from baseline (p < 0.017). At follow-up, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels were lower in EBShort (-744 pg/mL; 95%CI: -282 to -1210 pg/mL) compared to EBLong. No differences in microbiota richness or abundance were observed. EBShort bread was effective in reducing some inflammation markers. The consumption of sourdough bread may offer potential benefits in reducing inflammation markers in individuals with metabolic syndrome; however, longer fermentation times did not show additional benefits.

Sexually transmitted infections, the epidemic that persists after the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people in Catalonia.

Guiriguet C, Alberny M, Mora N, Rebagliato O, Roca C, Fina F, Fàbregas M, Benítez M, de la Poza M, Medina M, Flayeh S, Pedrazas D, Sabatés M and Coma E
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1186/s12875-024-02395-4 PMID:38704552

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to analyse the trends in the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective population-based study using data from primary care electronic health records spanning from January 2016 to December 2022 (involving 5.1 million people older than 14 years). We described the daily number of new STI diagnoses from 2016 to 2022; as well as the monthly accumulation of new STI diagnoses for each year. We compared the monthly averages of new diagnoses in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 using the T-test. Finally, we performed a segmented regression analysis of the daily number of STI diagnoses. RESULTS: We analysed 200,676 new STI diagnoses. The number of diagnoses abruptly decreased coinciding with the lockdown. Overall in 2020, we observed a reduction of 15%, with higher reductions for specific STIs such as gonorrhoea (-21%), chlamydia (-24%), and HIV (-31%) compared to 2019. Following this drastic drop, which was temporarily associated with the lockdown, we observed a rapid rebound. In 2021, the number of STI diagnoses was similar to that of 2019. Notably, we found a considerable increase in 2022, particularly for non-specific STI, which lack laboratory confirmation (67% increase). HIV was the only STI with a reduction of up to -38% in diagnoses at the end of 2022 compared to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: After a significant reduction in 2020, the number of STIs recorded in primary care rapidly rebounded, and the current trend is similar to that of 2019, except for HIV. These findings underscore the dynamic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on STI diagnoses and highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring and public health interventions in the post-pandemic period.

Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination coverage: an ecological study of primary health care and socio-economic factors in Catalonia, Spain.

Martínez-Marcos M, Reñé-Reñé A, Zabaleta-Del-Olmo E, Guiriguet C, Gómez-Durán EL and Cabezas-Peña C
Aten Primaria.2022 Aug; 54(9):102437.doi:10.1057/s41271-024-00484-3 PMID:38664542

This study examined the association of socio-economic factors and the structure of primary care centres (PCCs) with measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination coverage among the 8-year-old population in Catalonia, Spain. We conducted an ecological study to retrospectively assess the MMR vaccination-recorded status of children born in 2012, using public health data extracted in December 2020. For each of 300 PCCs serving 70,498 children, we calculated vaccination coverage rates from electronic health records and linked these rates to a composite deprivation index corresponding to the territory served by each PCC. We identified a relationship between unfavourable socio-economic factors and higher recorded vaccination coverage. On average, directly managed PCCs had higher vaccination coverage rates than indirectly managed PCCs. Greater utilisation of primary care services by the population was also associated with higher vaccination coverage rates. Further research is needed to generate knowledge valuable for informing more equitable child-vaccination service delivery models.

Patronat

Col·laboradors

Acreditacions