M. GONZALEZ-DEL-RIO, C. BERTRAN-NOGUER, L. RAMIO-TORRENTA and E. ZABALETA-DEL-OLMO
2022 Sep 1; . doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.020; PMID:35654266
Objectives: This review aimed to summarize the evidence on the measurement properties of available disease-related knowledge mea-surement instruments in people with multiple sclerosis. Study Design and Setting: We performed a literature search in the MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) databases from inception to February 10, 2021. Eligible studies were reports developing a disease-related knowledge mea-surement instrument or assessing one or more of its measurement properties. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies independently using the “COSMIN Risk of Bias “checklist. We graded the quality of the evidence using a GRADE approach. Results: Twenty-four studies provided information on 14 measurement instruments. All instruments showed sufficient evidence for content validity, three for structural validity, and seven for hypothesis testing for construct validity. Cross-cultural validity and criterion validity were not assessed in any instrument. Only two instruments showed sufficient evidence for the internal consistency of their scores, and two others for their test -retest reliability. Responsiveness was assessed in one instrument, but it was rated as indeterminate. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, two instruments can be recommended for use, two are unrecommended, and five have the potential to be recommended for use but require further research.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
M. RODRIGUEZ, F. PERNAS, A. CALLEJAS, C. GARCIA, I. ESPUNA and J. GARCIA
2022 Sep 1; . doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102393; PMID:35779366
Objetive To describe the incidence and mortality of the first wave of COVID-19 in the elderly population of Barcelona, according to their previous levels of frailty. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting and participants: Population aged 65 or over assigned to the Barcelona Primary Care centres of the Institut Catala de la Salut, followed between March and June 2020. Main measurements: Frailty was calculated at baseline from the computerised medical records. Results during follow-up: diagnosis of COVID-19, possible or confirmed with PCR and all-cause mortality. Results: 251 788 patients over 64 years of age were analysed, 61.3% had some level of frailty, 27.8% moderate or severe. The incidence of COVID-19 was 3.13 cases per 100 inhabitants (N = 7883) and the mortality from COVID-19 was 21.5% (N = 1691). Both the incidence and mor-tality from COVID-19 were higher at older age, in men, at greater deprivation and at a higher level of frailty. Individuals with mild, moderate, and severe frailty had an adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) for COVID-19 disease of 1.47, 2.08, and 3.50, respectively. Among subjects with COVID-19, those with mild, moderate, and severe frailty had an adjusted HR for COVID-19 mortality of 1.44, 1.69, and 2.47, respectively. Conclusions: We consider it necessary to address frailty also in a pandemic situation, since it is a treatable condition and in turn a more serious risk factor for COVID-19, where the role of primary care is essential, due to its accessibility and longitudinal character. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
A. ROMERO-COLLADO, E. HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ-ESPARZA, E. ZABALETA-DEL-OLMO, A. URPI-FERNANDEZ and R. SANTESMASES-MASANA
2022 Sep 1; . doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1737; PMID:35659485
Objectives: This psychometric systematic review aimed to identify the most suitable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of quality of life (QoL) in people affected by diabetic foot.
Methods: We performed a literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) databases from inception to February 1, 2022. We also searched gray literature databases. Eligible studies were full-text reports developing a QoL condition-specific PROM or assessing one or more of its measurement properties in people affected by diabetic foot. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies independently using the “Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias “checklist. The measurement properties were evaluated using specific criteria. We graded the quality of the evidence using a “Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation ” approach modified by Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments.
Results: Forty-three reports (46 studies) providing information on the measurement properties of 10 different PROMs were included. We did not identify any instruments that could be recommended for use. We identified 2 PROMs that were not recommended for use and 8 that were potentially recommended but would require further investigation. Of these 8 PROMs, 4 had better evidence for content validity.
Conclusions: Available PROMs to measure QoL in people affected by diabetic foot have limited evidence for their measurement properties. There is no fully suitable PROM. Pending further evidence, 4 PROMs could potentially be recommended for use.
Forés R, Alzamora MT, Boixadera-Planas E, Vázquez A, Pera G and Torán P
2022 Sep 1; . doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102437; PMID:35964545
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, with real world data (SIDIAP and CMBD), the evolution of the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the Catalan population and the cardiovascular risk factors present in people with this pathology. DESIGN: Longitudinal descriptive population study. SITE: Primary health care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients listed in SIDIAP and CMBD with a diagnosis of peripheral artery disease between 2008 and 2018 = 35 years, as well as those without a diagnosis, but with an ABI < 0.9 in SIDIAP. INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Main variable AP (ICD-9, ICD-10). Sociodemographic data, risk factors and cardiovascular disease, drug use and prevalent cardiovascular events at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: 141,520 patients were studied. 75% had hypertension, 58% were smokers or former smokers, and 23% had a myocardial infarction. The global prevalence increased from 1.15% in 2008 to 3.10% in 2018. The prevalence of PAD increased with age, with a moderate increase at younger ages, and more pronounced in > 55 years, exceeding 10% in > 85 years. CONCLUSION: This is a population study where it is observed that the evolution of the prevalence of peripheral artery disease has presented a constant increase during the years 2008-2018, being higher in men, especially from 55 years of age. Studies with large databases can facilitate the design and implementation of new policies in national health systems.
J. JIMENEZ-BALADO, I. RIBA-LLENA, C. NAFRIA, J. PIZARRO, D. RODRIGUEZ-LUNA, O. MAISTERRA, A. BALLVE, X. MUNDET, C. VIOLAN, O. VENTURA, J. MONTANER and P. DELGADO
2022 Aug 1; . doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003154; PMID:35881448
Background and aims: We aimed to study the relationship between cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) lesions, as markers of subclinical target organ damage (TOD) in the brain, and incident cardiovascular events (CVE).
Methods: Data from the ISSYS (Investigating Silent Strokes in hYpertensives Study), which is a longitudinal and observational study conducted in patients with hypertension aged 50-70 years, and stroke-free at the inclusion. At the baseline visit, participants underwent a clinical interview, a brain MRI, urine and blood sampling collection and vascular testing studies. Therefore, we obtained markers of TOD from the brain [white matter hyperintensities, silent brain infarcts (SBI), cerebral microbleeds and enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS)], from kidney (microalbuminuria, glomerular filtration) and regarding large vessels [ankle-to-brachial index (ABI), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity]. Survival analyses were used to assess the relationship between these predictors and the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVE).
Results: We followed-up 964 individuals within a median time of 5 years (4.7-5), representing 4377.1 persons-year. We found 73 patients presenting incident CVE, which corresponds to a rate of 8.2%. We found ABI less than 0.9 [hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-4.13, P value = 0.014] and SBI (hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% CI 1.47-5.58, P value = 0.002) independently associated with higher risk of incident CVE. The inclusion of both variables in a clinical model resulted in an increased discrimination of individuals with new CVE of 4.72%, according to the integrated discrimination index.
Conclusion: Assessment of SBI and ABI less than 0.9 may refine the cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with hypertension.